Comments on: Do you approve of dogs’s tails being docked and their ears being snipped? ?

By: Bear

Bear — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:02:23 +0000

Bastar * S!

By: Zed

Zed — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:08:31 +0000

Not at all. It is illegal in the United Kingdom. Totally illegal, and all reputable breeding knows. I hope Holly Crawford is in jail for it. She is now visible mal.Nous Boxers and Dobermans with tails! I think the good love dogs eux.J. . . & Cat. You are so beautiful and soft.:)

By: ♥emslovespaddy♥

♥emslovespaddy♥ — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:06:05 +0000

Not that Jeen Gothic regards cats, it was to sell and make money. Animals suffer enough from the people. This woman is a fucking crackhead

By: mike ingham UK

mike ingham UK — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:29:22 +0000

Only if the owner gets the same treatment at the same time. Joking apart I think all alterations of animals are cruelty to animals and should be banned.

By: happyjar

happyjar — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:07:52 +0000

I do not approve of the tail or ear biopsies of dogs, cats or humans. There is no legitimate reason. This is for the appearance and did nothing plus.L whole “gothic kitten” thing is just bizarre … Why not just pure black cats and call it “goth.” Piercing pets is just weird. Add: What not to do ear piercing small children, I do not think parents should be so. decide the child, but let alone when they hit 9th Class or something.

By: Kerry

Kerry — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:39:32 +0000

of course there’s a difference. Cats crawl through bushes etc. what if these ‘harmless’ piercings get caught? you do see animals with tags in their ears, but this is another example of animals being an accessory.

By: Dizzykat

Dizzykat — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:16:16 +0000

Was this in America by any chance. People who do this are sick and should not be on the streets. They should be locked up and kept on medication. Why would anyone want a gothic cat. Hope she gets a stiff sentence and is banned from owning animals and having internet access for life. Poor cats and dogs must be traumatised. How can anyone get pleasure from that

By: Wounded Duck

Wounded Duck — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:46:23 +0000

nope

By: Beastie

Beastie — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:29:40 +0000

No, it is not necessarily fÃ ¼ r each medical reason is necessary, it of the British law is forbidden, like it is only a cosmetic correction, over a nature, no other choice, or nÃ©cessitÃ©.Ayant your animals well treated nothing else at the fact that the tail betrÃ¤gt home grundsÃ¤tzlich the VerstÃ ¼ mmelung for no other reason is that, like it your domestic animal too more regarder. G_davis want. … Nerve of the LÃ¤nge the tail of a dog. As to the devil you believe that the lowering some StÃ &quot ¼ ck the tail Away; doesn’t pain become? The only reason, pain does not do, if it us anasthetic. Une much, if I with PETA, which is far rather the rights of the animals more fascist agrees mÃ ¼ ssen, are them on this occasion to correct.

By: G_Davis

G_Davis — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:55:10 +0000

I am not correct with the Piercings agree, but in some Fällen, I am correct with tail Clipping. Springer Spaniels can be very unpleasant, if the remainder of the rod should become on the left side. They f